Third Grade District Assessments
|
Grade |
Subject |
Assessment |
Section |
Skills |
NPS/NJDOE |
Date |
|
Third |
LAL |
NPS |
September & May |
|||
|
Third |
LAL |
NPS |
September & May |
|||
|
Third |
LAL |
NPS |
November, January,
& March |
|||
|
Third |
LAL |
NPS |
Fall & Spring |
|||
|
Third |
Math |
NPS |
|
|||
|
Third |
Math |
Textbook |
Unit assessments |
|||
|
Third |
Math |
NPS |
January & June |
|||
|
Third |
Math |
NPS |
Fall |
|||
|
Third |
LAL & Math |
NJDOE |
Spring |
|||
|
Third |
Science |
NPS |
|
1.
Decoding
and automatic word recognition skills. - Slosson Oral Reading Word Test
Students
are asked to read words within 5 seconds each from graded word lists. It yields
a raw score that can be converted into age/grade equivalent scores. Third grade
students are expected to be able to accurately read 101 to 105 words from the
lists by the Spring assessment.
The
context free identification of a large number of words with accuracy and speed,
is characteristic of a skilled reader. Automatic, fluent word recognition allows
a reader's attention to focus almost exclusively on text meaning. On the other
hand, children who are not able to recognize words with automaticity will
encounter comprehension difficulty as their attention is diverted from meaning
making to the identification of individual words. Readers utilize a variety of
word attack strategies to identify out of context words - analogy, chunking,
sight memory, etc. Providing additional opportunities to read increases reading
vocabulary, automaticty, and fluency.
Utilizes
selected text level reading, spanning a range of text difficulty from emergent
to grade five, to assess a student's discrete instructional reading level. The
student must maintain phasing and fluency while reading text, which is observed
and noted. The student's level of accuracy is noted on the "Running
Record" by counting the number of miscues and referencing the
"Observation Guide" to assess the accuracy rate, which is expected to
be 34 to 38 in the Spring of the third grade.
In
addition to the overall instructional reading levels, observing the student's
reading fluency shows how he/she reads word by word, fluency, phased reading,
punctuation and syntax, and rereading for problem solving all have instructional
implications that may need to be addressed with interventions. The information
gathered from this assessment enables us to:
a.
Determine
the student's independent and instructional levels;
b.
Confirm
or redirect ongoing instruction;
c.
Group
students effectively for reading experiences and instruction;
d.
Determine
if the student is working below proficiency and needs further intervention.
Oral
Reading Fluency – November, January and March
Students are required to read appropriate grade level narrative or expository text within a timed interval. The Oral Reading Fluency assessment provides a teacher the opportunity to assess oral reading fluency, compute a fluency score, interpret the score, and make comparisons of progress at intervals throughout the school year. This individualized assessment requires the teacher to take a running record of student performance measuring accuracy as well as reading rate.
Instructional Implications
The observable and measurable data
on the above assessments should identify strengths and weaknesses to be
addressed in classroom instruction, school-based interventions,
special education evaluations and
reports, and/or IEP
programs/services (e.g., IEP PLAAFP statements, goals and objectives,
etc.).
Writing
Assessments
Students are
provided 30 minutes to draft a response to a narrative prompt. During the assessment period, the teacher should walk around
the room and record notes on individual children.
Collect the students’ writing at the end of the testing period.
The student’s work is scored using the primary version of the Registered Holistic Scoring Method Rubric. The collection of student work provides authentic data on which to assess progress; show what the child knows about the processes of writing and spelling; identify particular strengths and instructional needs; and influence instructional decisions, the selection of resources and teaching strategies. Review class data sheet for all students to see if selected student scores above/below benchmark and how they perform compared to classmates to identify each student’s strengths and weaknesses, which should be addressed in classroom instructions, school-based interventions, special education evaluations and reports, as well as IEP PLAAFP statements, goals and objectives.
In
addition to the overall rubric score we should note the criteria skills that
were and were not exhibited to guide instruction. The information that's
gathered helps assess if the student:
a. Has a
desire to write and knows what they want to write;
b.
Employs
spelling and proofreading strategies;
c.
Uses
phonemic awareness to spell words;
d.
Has known
words at their disposal;
e. Is
correctly/incorrectly forming certain letters, mastered the rules of
directionality, etc.;
f. Has
mastered certain stages of writing and spelling;
g.
Uses
capital letters, lower case letters, begins sentences with a capital letter,
ends sentences with punctuation marks, has a knowledge of first/last letter,
consonant and vowel sounds;
h.
Takes a
risk to write imaginatively rather than sticking to a pattern of known words,
repetitive sentences, or the same stories;
i. Knows
what a sentence is.
Mathematics
Assessments
Practice
New Jersey ASK - Mathematics
The
NJ Practice ASK was designed by the district and closely resembles the format of
the New Jersey Standardized assessment administered in Grade 3.
Practice dealing with enhanced multiple choice questions and open-ended
questions enables children to approach the NJASK in March with increased
confidence and skill. Teachers may use results of the practice test thoroughly
analyzing student responses to provide information on areas of strength and
weakness by student, class, school, and district
Math
Midterm and Final Assessments:
These
assessments are designed by the district and are similar in format to the New
Jersey Standardized assessments.
On
the mid-term and finals, there
are both
multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Most of the questions are
multiple-choice, where the student chooses the best answer from among 4 choices
and uses an answer sheet to darken in the circle of the correct choice. For the
open-ended questions, the student writes and/or draws answers to these questions
in the open-ended booklet provided with the test.
The
open-ended questions are scored with specifically designed Scoring Rubrics for
math that gives 0 to 3 points for each answer. The rubrics help ensure that
students are scored in the same way for the same demonstration of knowledge and
skills regardless of the scorer. The open-ended questions require students to
construct and explain their own written or graphic responses. Students earn
points by showing their work and clearly explaining how a solution was reached.
The
unit assessments are part of the Everyday Mathematics series published by McGraw
Hill. These assessments are closely
aligned to the NJCCCS and are administered at the end of each unit.
The questions on these assessments contain both pure computation and word
problems. In addition, teachers may
use the Assessment Assistant (a component of Everyday Math) to tailor
computer-generated assessments formatted in the same way as the unit tests to
the needs of the class.
As
part of the Third Grade Everyday Math Kit, each teacher receives an Assessment
Handbook. The handbook contains
masters for individual student profiles and class profiles correlated to the
objectives unit by unit. Teachers
are encouraged to use this as part of daily on-going assessment in conjunction
with portfolio assessment of students.
Performance assessment tasks for children in grades K-8 that meet national standards to improve assessment and instruction have been downloaded to all networked Newark Public School computer labs. Each EXEMPLAR includes a performance task and the context for the assignment, a specific rubric, annotated benchmark papers at Novice, Apprentice, Practitioner and Expert levels, concepts to be assessed and skills to be developed, interdisciplinary links and teaching tips, possible solutions, suggestions on how students might carry out the task, and the estimated time required.
Instructional Implications
The above math
assessments identify student’s strengths & weaknesses,
-FOSS assessment takes the form of informal teacher observation and teacher questioning. The teacher guide suggests behavior to watch for during investigations and questions to ask about the content. Assessments fall into two categories: formative and summative. Formative assessments are integrated into instruction. Based on these two means of assessment, teachers will know how to adjust their teaching for individual students or for the whole class. A recording system is included.
-In STC modules, assessment is based on recorded observations, student’s work products and oral communication. All these documentation methods combine to give a comprehensive picture of each student’s growth. Throughout a module, assessments are incorporated, or embedded, into lessons. The first lesson of each module is designed to be a pre-assessment and is revisited at the end of each module in the form of a post assessment.New Jersey's Core Curriculum Content Standards (CCCS) -
The above district wide and statewide assessments are aligned with New Jersey's Core Curriculum Content Standards. Therefore, teachers, parents, administrators, school-based intervention teams and/or IEP teams can utilize the hyperlinked CPI (cumulative progress indicator) checklists developed by the Newark Teachers Union (NTU) for reading, writing, math, and science to identify strengths and weaknesses, in the corresponding grade's knowledge/skills. These strengths and weaknesses can be integrated into teachers' lessons, school-based interventions, special education evaluations/corresponding reports, and IEPs (e.g., PLAAFP statements, goals/objectives, and supplementary aids and services.