Fifth
Grade District Assessments
|
Grade |
Subject |
Assessment |
Section |
Skills |
NPS/NJDOE |
Date |
|
Fifth |
LAL |
NPS |
Fall
& Spring |
|||
|
Fifth |
LAL |
NPS |
November
& May |
|||
|
Fifth |
LAL |
Harcourt |
Fall
|
|||
|
Fifth |
LAL |
NPS |
November,
January, & March |
|||
|
Fifth |
Math |
NPS |
|
|||
|
Fifth |
Math |
Textbook |
Unit
assessments |
|||
|
Fifth |
Math |
NPS |
January
& June |
|||
|
Fifth |
LAL
& Math |
NPS |
Spring |
|||
|
Fifth |
Science |
NPS |
|
Narrative
Writing Assessments – Fall
& Spring
Format
& Tasks
Student writes a narrative story for 25 minutes in response to a prompt read by the teacher. The teacher scores this narrative using the Registered Holistic Scoring Rubric method, where a student can earn 1-6 points. A rubric score of 4 is expected in the 5th grade. Review class data sheet for all students to see if selected student scores above/below benchmark and how they perform compared to classmates identify and address each student’s strengths and weaknesses in classroom instruction, school-based interventions, special education evaluations and reports, as well as IEP PLAAFP statements, goals and objectives, and addressed with lesson plans.
Instructional
Implications
In
addition to the overall rubric score we should note the criteria skills that
were and were not exhibited from NJDOE’s rubric. This analysis can guide
instruction, including setting goals and addressing weaknesses. In this
endeavor, note the following skills from NJDOE’s rubric:
1.
Content /
Organization - communicates intended message to intended audience; relates to
topic; opening and closing; focused; logical progression of ideas; transitions;
& appropriate details and information
2.
Usage -
tense formation; subject-verb agreement; pronouns usage/ agreement; word
choice/meaning; & proper modifiers)
3.
Sentence
Construction - variety of type, structures, and length; & correct
construction
4.
Mechanics
– spelling, punctuation, & capitalization
In addition, NJDOE’s Editing & Revising Rubric, Author’s Self Reporting Form, as well as Cumulative Progress Indicators can be utilized to identify strengths and weaknesses to be addressed in lesson plans, school-based interventions, special education evaluations and reports and integrated into IEPs (e.g., PLAAFP Statements, Goals & Objectives, & Supplementary Aids and Services).
The following research-based instructional strategies can address identified weaknesses and included in lesson plans, school-based interventions, and/or as supplemental aids and services to address IEP goals and objectives, based on a student’s needs:
1.
Model the
writing we want student to produce independently.
2.
Provide
coaching and scaffolding where necessary.
3.
Have
student articulate and reflect on compositional strengths and needs.
4.
Provide
student with frequent writing experiences in all content areas to build
confidence and competence.
5.
Student
should generate topics, plan, write, revise, and edit writing.
1.
Novels Assessment – Fall & Spring
All
students in the 5th grade read the same novel in the fall and another
novel in the Spring. There are classroom activities where the text is discussed,
multiple perspectives are shared, & insights are gained. In December & May all 5th grade students are given the same assessment on these two
books. The assessments are given on the same day throughout the district and
take place during a 40-minute period. The assessments also follow the same
format as the State's standards-based assessments. There are 10 multiple-choice
questions worth 5 points each and 2 open-ended questions worth 25 points each.
Each open-ended question utilizes the NJDOE
scoring rubric with the following point allocations: rubric score of 4 = 25
points; rubric score of 3 = 15 points; rubric score of 2 = 10 points; rubric
score of 1 = 5 points; & rubric score of 0 = 0 points.
Reading
Comprehension –
1.
Recognition
of theme or central idea
2.
Recognition
of details that develop or support the main idea
3.
Extrapolation
of information &/or following directions
4.
Paraphrasing,
retelling, or interpreting words, phrases, or sentences from the text
5.
Recognition
of the organizational structure of a text
6.
Recognition
of a purpose for reading
7.
Questioning
8.
Prediction
of tentative meanings
9.
Making
judgments &/or forming opinions
10.
Drawing
conclusions from the text
11.
Drawing
conclusions or drawing inferences
12.
Interpretation
of textual conventions & literacy elements or devices
The
student’s performance on the above skills can assist in identifying strengths
and weakness, which can be addressed in lesson plans, school-based
interventions, special education evaluations/reports, and integrated into IEPs (e.g., PLAAFP Statements, Goals & Objectives,
& Supplementary Aids and Services). The district’s curriculum and the Harcourt textbook
resources can be utilized to enrich skills where strengths are noted and address
weaknesses.
Based on the item analysis of the reading skills being assessed, strengths and weaknesses will be identified. The district’s curriculum and the Harcourt textbook resources can be utilized to enrich skills where strengths are noted and address weaknesses. In addition, NJDOE’s cumulative progress indicators, framework activities, as well as vignettes can be utilized to enrich identified strengths and address areas of weakness. These reading strengths & weaknesses can be addressed in lesson plans, school-based interventions, special education evaluations and reports and integrated into IEPs (e.g., PLAAFP Statements, Goals & Objectives, & Supplementary Aids and Services).
2.
Harcourt Placement & Diagnostic Assessment
– Fall
Format
& Content – The student is presented with multiple reading tasks that assess
performance in reading comprehension, reading vocabulary, phonemic awareness,
& phonics.
Instructional
Implications – This assessment identifies student’s strengths & weaknesses, which
can be addressed in lesson plans, school-based interventions, special education evaluations and reports and integrated
into IEPs (e.g., PLAAFP Statements, Goals & Objectives, & Supplementary
Aids and Services). .
Oral
Reading Fluency - November, January, March
Students
are required to read appropriate grade level narrative or expository text within
a timed interval. The Oral Reading
Fluency assessment provides a teacher the opportunity to assess oral reading
fluency, compute a fluency score, interpret the score, and make comparisons of
progress at intervals throughout the school year.
This individualized assessment requires the teacher to take a running
record of student performance measuring accuracy as well as reading rate.
This observable and measurable data should be identified as strengths
and weaknesses in school-based interventions, special education evaluations and reports, as well as IEP PLAAFP
statements, goals and objectives, and addressed with lesson plans.
Math
Midterm and Final Assessments:
These
assessments are designed by the district and are similar in format to the New
Jersey Standardized assessments.
On
the mid-term and finals, there
are both
multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Most of the questions are
multiple-choice, where the student chooses the best answer from among 4 choices
and uses an answer sheet to darken in the circle of the correct choice. For the
open-ended questions, the student writes and/or draws answers to these questions
in the open-ended booklet provided with the test.
The
open-ended questions are scored with specifically designed Scoring Rubrics for
math that gives 0 to 3 points for each answer. The rubrics help ensure that
students are scored in the same way for the same demonstration of knowledge and
skills regardless of the scorer. The open-ended questions require students to
construct and explain their own written or graphic responses. Students earn
points by showing their work and clearly explaining how a solution was reached.
The
unit assessments are part of the Everyday Mathematics series published by McGraw
Hill. These assessments are closely
aligned to the NJCCCS and are administered at the end of each unit.
The questions on these assessments contain both pure computation and word
problems. In addition, teachers may
use the Assessment Assistant (a component of Everyday Math) to tailor
computer-generated assessments formatted in the same way as the unit tests to
the needs of the class.
As
part of the Grade 5 Everyday Math Kit, each teacher receives an Assessment
Handbook. The handbook contains
masters for individual student profiles and class profiles correlated to the
objectives unit by unit. Teachers
are encouraged to use this as part of daily on-going assessment in conjunction
with portfolio assessment of students.
Performance assessment tasks for children in grades K-8 that meet national standards to improve assessment and instruction have been downloaded to all networked Newark Public School computer labs. Each EXEMPLAR includes a performance task and the context for the assignment, a specific rubric, annotated benchmark papers at Novice, Apprentice, Practitioner and Expert levels, concepts to be assessed and skills to be developed, interdisciplinary links and teaching tips, possible solutions, suggestions on how students might carry out the task, and the estimated time required.
Instructional Implications
The above math
assessments identify student’s strengths & weaknesses,
The
SPA assessments are similar in content and design to NJ-ASK, GEPA, and HSPA. It
is a standards-based assessment given to all Newark’s 5th grade
students in March; however, it assesses CPI expectations for the end of the 5th
grade. In addition, although it utilizes multiple-choice and open-ended
questions, evaluated with scoring rubrics, the reporting out doesn’t provide
this type of differentiated feedback, nor an item analysis on how each student
performs on each assessed skill. Consequently, the ability to identify each
student’s strengths and weaknesses is very limited.
The
various subjects are reported as scale scores that range from 100 to 300, and
help identify various proficiency levels of our students in each assessed
subject. If the student is in the "Advanced Proficient" or
"Proficient" level, he/she has met the state standards for that
content area. A student needs to achieve a minimum score of 200 to achieve
proficiency in that subject. On the other hand, scores below 200 are in the
"Partially Proficient" level, which means that the student has not met
the state's minimum level of proficiency in that subject. Clearly, on a global
level, the proficiency level in LAL and Math can identify strengths and
weaknesses.
In
addition, each student’s Individual Student’s Report (ISR) allows for a
cluster analysis for each subject. Each subject (Language Arts Literacy &
Math) has subtotals for all the clusters of skills that make up that subject.
|
Subject |
Cluster
Skills |
|
Language
Arts Literacy |
Writing
and Reading |
Math |
Number
sense, operations, & properties; Spatial sense & geometry; Data
analysis, probability, & discrete mathematics; Patterns &
algebra |
This
section of the ISR compares the student’s performance in each particular
cluster skill to other students who just achieved proficiency (score of 200) on
the overall assessment. Therefore, relative strengths and/or weaknesses may be
cautiously identified for students performing above &/or below this “Just
Proficient Mean” respectively. These relative strengths and weaknesses should
be integrated into special education evaluations and reports, IEP PLAAFP
statements and goals/objectives, and classroom instructional activities. (For a
more comprehensive analysis of a student’s assessment results see the Example
of an analysis of Individual Student Report (ISR)
However, to get a true picture of each student’s strengths and weaknesses in the general education curriculum his/her scores on the SPA must be supplemented with class work, homework, teacher-made tests, district wide assessments discussed above, and the Cumulative Progress Indicators, which specify the expectations by the end of the 5th grade on learning New Jersey’s Core Curriculum Content Standards (CCCS), referenced on the bottom of this page.
-FOSS assessment takes the form of informal teacher observation and teacher questioning. The teacher guide suggests behavior to watch for during investigations and questions to ask about the content. Assessments fall into two categories: formative and summative. Formative assessments are integrated into instruction. Based on these two means of assessment, teachers will know how to adjust their teaching for individual students or for the whole class. A recording system is included.
-In STC modules, assessment is based on recorded observations, student’s work products and oral communication. All these documentation methods combine to give a comprehensive picture of each student’s growth. Throughout a module, assessments are incorporated, or embedded, into lessons. The first lesson of each module is designed to be a pre-assessment and is revisited at the end of each module in the form of a post assessment.
The above district wide and statewide assessments are aligned with New Jersey's Core Curriculum Content Standards. Therefore, teachers, parents, administrators, school-based intervention teams and/or IEP teams can utilize the hyperlinked CPI (cumulative progress indicator) checklists developed by the Newark Teachers Union (NTU) for reading, writing, math, and science to identify strengths and weaknesses, in the corresponding grade's knowledge/skills. These strengths and weaknesses can be integrated into teachers' lessons, school-based interventions, special education evaluations/corresponding reports, and IEPs (e.g., PLAAFP statements, goals/objectives, and supplementary aids and services.